Friday, January 9, 2015

Shooting Irons, Part 3

R - Sharps

What would the Old West be without the gun? From the Hawken of the Mountain man to the Peacemaker of the gunslinger, we just can’t imagine our protagonists any other way. A gun was not just a means of war between men, but a way to put food on the table and protect against wild animals. Of course, there was that ever-present incentive to politeness we’ve already discussed…

Here’s Part 3 of our gun glossary.

Reach, reach for the sky: raise your hands in surrender when a gun was pointed your way

Remington: Eliphalet Remington of Ilion, NY, made his first flintlock muzzle-loader in 1816; by 1828, he had a thriving business and was later joined by his sons. In 1845, he made his first standard arms in large batches for the military. He manufactured exclusively for the North during the war, but both sides used weapons of his pattern. After the war, more veterans purchased their Remingtons than did Colt users. Early models, built to the Beal’s patent, were massive (2 lb, 14 oz), but beautiful in design and good in balance, easily recognizable by the slope from the trigger to the tip of the lever-hammer. They were cap-and-ball, single-action guns. The New Army and Navy models (cap-and-ball) were still in demand until 1888 and 1875 respectively, and were often converted for metal cartridge use – the firm produced a conversion kit so that the owner could exchange chambers and use the weapon either way. Remington also made “derringers,” pocket revolvers, shotguns, rifles and carbines. An important step in the evolution of the rifle was the introduction of the rolling-block breech, which greatly increased the loading speed. Also, through the nature of construction, it became stronger at the moment of ignition; the greater the recoil, the more tightly the parts of the breech interlocked. The early model rifle was an instant success in the West. Nelson Strong, a trail driver, and his crew proved its capability by fighting off a large band of Sioux led by Crazy Horse.



Repeater: sometimes in the early days used to refer to a revolver, but more usually to a rifle capable of firing a number of shots without reloading

Revolver: Flint-locks were in limited use in the US and Europe at the beginning of the 19th Century, but made no great impression on gun-handlers until Sam Colt came along with his adaptation of the cap-lock to the principle of the revolver. In 1835, at age 21, Colt patented it in England, and in the US the next year. The Paterson Colt was first used by the Texas Rangers in action against “some astonished and shortly after, mostly dead” Comanches in 1844. Early guns were cap-and-ball, and such weapons were used right into the 1870’s for a number of reasons. Some were reluctant to change to the new-fangled metal cartridges which came into use in the late 1850’s; they knew their old guns well and the cap-and-ball, because it limited their shots, made them more careful. The loading of the old guns was also more economical, and cartridges were not always easily available. There were a number of pretty good guns besides Colts: Remington, Starr, Smith and Wesson, Le Mat, Irving, Trantor, Adams, and a good many others. Some of these ancient hog-legs were like young cannon and weighed two to three pounds. Despite what is said, guns of 1850-70 could be fired accurately in the right hands; however, size prevented them from the fast-draw. Most men, even at quite a late period, wore weapons pretty high on the hip; most carried one gun on the right side for the orthodox draw. Mounted men favored a gun position high on the left with the gun butt forward.

Saddle-gun: a rifle or carbine that was attached to and carried on the saddle, either by a string over the horn, in or out of a scabbard, or booted under the leg of the rider – unsatisfactory for long trips, as it chafed the horse. Earlier, the term also covered horse-pistols.



Scabbards: this term was used more commonly in the general sense than today, covering gun-holsters, rifle-boots, and sword- and knife-sheaths.
            Gun Holsters: After the Civil War, these had flaps to retain the gun and keep out dust, but in the decade afterward, these were mostly discarded as encumbrances. Until the  
mid-1870’s, holsters were plain and not cut away for a quick-draw. There were two basic styles: those with loops holding the holster to the skirt (the flat leather between the holster and leg) and those which were stitched to the skirt. The cutaway for the trigger-finger was not so vital to the user of a single-action gun, for whom the thumb-cock was the first move, so cutaways were necessary only when double-action guns came into use.  For a cross-draw, the scabbard was worn high with the gun close to the body; for the side-draw, the holster was slung at a slight angle to the body, leaving the butt clear. In the 1880’s and 1890’s, holsters were often artistically tooled, and by then, hideaways were in being and usually worn underneath the left armpit, suspended in a shoulder harness. The holster shape was dictated by the gun design. Not until the Peacemaker, with its compact shape, could a holster be made for the classic quick-draw. Shootists had holsters trimmed and fashioned to their own tastes – one had hip pockets lined with leather to hold his guns. Holsters were constructed with open fronts, necessitating a clip to hold the gun. One type was pivoted so that the gun could be elevated to be fired while still in the holster. But the average man kept his gun in a deep, safe scabbard so that, whatever happened, his gun would still be there when his hand went looking for it.


            Rifle scabbards: Dust was the great enemy of every Westerner who cared for his weapons; when a saddle-gun was taken on a trip, it had to be protected as much as possible. In the 1850’s, a much favored scabbard was a decorated doeskin Indian scabbard, used by both Indians and Whites. Most models covered both barrel and stock, leaving all or part of the butt exposed. During the Civil War, the cavalry employed a spider, a small socket affair attached to the off-side cinch ring, secured by a strap. The barrel of the carbine went through this, and was attached by a ring and swivel to the trooper’s shoulder-strap. Solid leather scabbards were official issue in 1885, and probably in use by civilians in the West before that. There were many ways of carrying a scabbard on a saddle, including hanging it from the horn loose and hanging it from the horn with the barrel secured by a latch under the rider’s legs.
            Fast-draw holsters: Tio Sam Myres, master saddlemaker of El Paso, created a holster to the requirements of master gun-handler and lawman Tom Threepersons: thick, hard leather that left hammer, trigger and butt clear of that leather. The scabbard tilted slightly forward and never lost shape once it was molded wet to the gun it was made for. Some old-timers may have pulled iron from leathers a slight faster than some of the opposition, but with holsters which were in use then, could never compare with 20th Century quick-draws.



Scattergun: a shotgun

Sharps: one of the greatest rifle-makers in the world. They made almost forty models between the 1840’s and 1881. They are usually associated with the Big Fifty of the last days of buffalo hunting; also with the Sharps-Borschardt .45, which could take a heavy load and penetrate thick buffalo hide in a way repeaters (such as the Henry and Spencer) could not. With production in 1875 of his .50-.90 (.50-caliber, .90 powder weight), Sharps responded to demands by hunters for a gun that could carry heavy charges. This charge could vary to 100 and 110 according to personal taste. Bowman (1953) describes the Sharps of 1848: “The Sharps’ action consisted of throwing forward the trigger guard, which dropped a sliding block at the rear of the barrel and uncovered the breech for loading. Paper and later Sharps’ linen cartridges …. were then inserted and after the trigger guard was drawn back, the rising block sheared off the rear end of the cartridge, exposing the powder charge. When the trigger guard was fully returned to position, the sliding block effectively covered the breech.” This was the pre-metallic cartridge Sharps. Buffalo Sharps were chambered for various metallic cartridge, .44, .45 (the 2 1/10 Sharps is the same as the .45-70 US) and in several .50-caliber loads.


Sources:
A Dictionary of the Old West, Peter Watts, 1977
Dictionary of the American West, Win Blevins, 1993
J.E.S Hays
www.jeshays.com



Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Ranger Jim's Ramblings for January

First of all, a Happy and Prosperous New Year to All.

This is not the original topic I'd planned to write about this month. However, some other projects have taken precedence, which I need to get  done before eyelid surgery in February. That, and the bitterly cold weather which has descended led me to this topic. As a caveat, let me say that while I'm no fan of the cold, I'm tired of how so many people today react as if it's the end of the world. News flash-  it's winter, it gets cold, and it snows... especially in New England, the Midwest, the Plains, and the Rockies. Get over it, deal with it, or move to Acapulco.

Which brings me to cold and, what else, horses?
Nowadays, you're as likely as not to see a horse blanketed in the winter. This is the worst possible thing you can do to a healthy horse. Horses naturally grow thick coats to insulate themselves against the cold. I can always tell how bad a winter is going to be by how thickly Yankee grows his coat.  Blanket a horse too soon, and he won't grow the coat he needs to protect himself against winter's chill.  When I first moved Yankee to Gina's, she used to call me to tell me Yankee didn't want to go in the barn (it's a free-choice barn), but would stay out in a blizzard. I told her he was happy, and would go inside with his buddies when he got cold. Snow will build up an inch or two on a horse's back, and not melt, if he has a good coat. The hair inside a horse's ears help protect them from the cold. Also, horses will naturally bunch together for warmth, usually with tails to the wind.  When the weather's cold, Yankee and Trooper will almost always crowd into the same stall, rather than their own individual ones. There are four horses at the barn, including Merlin the mini, and sometimes you'll even find three of them in the same stall. Unless your horse is ill, or you've shaved him because he's a show horse (disgusting, but it's done), don't blanket him.
The fact is, most horses love the snow. They love to run in it, buck in in, roll in it, and play in it. The snow and cold air make an old horse act like a colt again. And there's nothing quite like getting out on your horse and galloping through a foot of fresh, powdery snow, especially if your horse's hoofprints are the first tracks across the woods and fields. So as soon as we get a good snowfall, Yankee and I will be out there. Until then, Happy Trails.

"Ranger" Jim



In Memoriam


Hi- Troy Smith here, publisher at Western Trail Blazer and editor of WF's Wolf Creek series. I decided to use this space to talk about something that has been on my mind as I wrapped up my first year as WTB ramrod and prepare to start my second... and that is something that I don't believe anybody thinks about when they take on a job like this. And that is... the mortality of us all. It has felt very surreal preparing sales records for authors who have passed on, and communicating about their legacies with their bereaved families. So while we're celebrating the new and recent releases we have, and the writers of the future, I wanted to take a moment to celebrate the memories of three writers who put their brand on the western genre, and on the hearts of those who knew them well.

The first such author did not leave this mortal coil in the past year, but a little before that- in September of 2012. However, WTB is still working with his wife to release his unpublished work.

I am speaking of Lee Baldwin, who wrote westerns as Lee Aaron Wilson. Lee was one of the first writers to come onboard WTB in the first months of its existence. His novels include COLORADO JUSTICE, KILLDEERE CHALLENGE, and PA'S JOURNAL. (By the way, I am deliberately not including links or cover images -they are easy enough to find, if you are interested -because I want this post to be about paying tribute rather than advertising.)


Phyllis Baldwin provided these words as a memorial to her husband:

"Lee Aaron Wilson passed away suddenly in September, 2012.   He lived for his writing and hardly a day went by that he wasn’t at his computer either writing a new story or modifying an existing one.  Lee loved discussing and recounting various scenes and became very emotional as he described them.  As anyone can see when they read his stories, his characters definitely come to life and one can imagine him being a part of some of them.  The writing world lost a good storyteller."  





Mart Shaughnessy loved horses, showing his Appaloosas in four world championships. He came late to writing- as his website informs us:

"Mart has a Masters Degree in education and spent twenty years teaching and coaching football, then went into the family business until retirement. His first published work was a short story, Frontier Justice, which won the genre fiction category of the 2OO9 Writers Digest 78th Annual Writing Contest."

WTB published his western/time travel novel PALOMINO DAYS several years ago, and he had recently completed a sequel that we corresponded back and forth via email about publishing- when I received word he had passed away on May 22, 2014. We will be releasing that sequel, ESCAPE TO THE PAST, before spring.




The third writer WTB lost recently is well known to many of us here at Western Fictioneers, and a recipient of our lifetime achievement award -and deservedly so. Jory Sherman had a long and storied career, winning a slew of awards. His novel THE RUNNING GUN has been a mainstay at WTB for some time. While I knew Lee and Mart through their work and occasional email, I had considered Jory a close personal friend for many years and was struck especially hard by his passing. I am honored by the fact that one of his last works was a contribution to the Wolf Creek novel STAND PROUD; his character Roman Hatchett only showed up a few times in our fictional town, but he was distinctive and memorable.






I am a big fan of The Highwaymen, both as a group and individually. Waylon Jennings and Johnny Cash, in particular, always seemed to me to be good artistic role models- they had their own voices, and their own visions, and they refused to conform to the restraints of Nashville. This particular song by the two of them, "Heroes," is especially poignant to me, as they died in such similar circumstances and so close together in time... and because it is about the Hollywood cowboys of yesterday, and about the strength and frailty of our heroes, and of ourselves. So I'm posting a link to it below, in honor of Lee, and Mart, and Jory, and everyone else we have lost... who showed us the path to follow.


"Heroes, facing the fight
Calling for courage, trying to do right,
When the dust blows, and the light goes...
Give me a reason we all must carry on,
Like all the heroes have done."










Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Western Trail Blazer -New (and Recent) Releases


Western Trail Blazer has prepared some exciting books for you in the last quarter of 2014 (and the first week of 2015)... with many more right around the corner. We've been blessed with some truly talented authors who have entrusted us with sharing their creative visions... and we're passing the blessings on to you. If you love westerns (and of course you do!) you'll want to check these out.

Click on the images to see a bigger (readable!) version of the description.






kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: HERE



kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: Coming Soon



kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: HERE




kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: Coming Soon



kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: Coming Soon



kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE
paperback: Coming Soon


And some great short fiction...




kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE




kindle: HERE
smashwords: HERE


Get 'em now, we're makin' more.






Monday, January 5, 2015

A Marketing Plan, a Marketeer, a Brand


In preparation to take up the first Monday of every month blog, I read prior WF blogs. I have read every December blog and I have set the year-long intention to read all 257 blogs from 2014 and the current ones. December blogs averaged 879 words. Two-years worth will amount to some 520,000 words, 5 or 6 Western Fictioneers’ novels! A massive array of topics and approaches led to the question: what am I going to take up on my first Monday? To zip through the reasoning process, I am going to take up an Odyssey - my quest to market my books and build a brand. I am not all that sure I want to become a marketeer, I already have as much as I can handle in trying to become a goodwriter of novels. At the moment, between Scylla and Charybdisseems to be my only choice.

I count it lucky that the blog is the first Monday of every month. One of the principles to establish for myself and this blog is to use the first Monday of very month to review what we will do this month and this year to market our work and promote our brand. “Do” for our purposes means: create the marketing plan, implement the marketing plan, and reap the results. I invite you to watch over my shoulder, share your ideas and suggestions, and participate all along the way. As Tom Rizzo said in one of his blogs, consider this a participatory blog. In the Comments section below, leave your questions, recommendations, stories, and tips.

Create the Marketing Plan. It could be that a few may read this blog who have the same problem. I have no idea how many writers, particularly Western Fictioneers writers, know how to market the work, sell the books, and write the next one, keeping all tasks miraculously in balance. Probably many of you are out there. I have met at least one of you – well, one pair of you: Kat and L.J. Martin.

Anyway, a year has passed since I responded to Cheryl’s request for a Friday Five. I had no idea, then, how much would happen in the year. About that time, I had a manuscript out to two publishers — eerily similar to my current situation. A month later, Pen-L Publishing committed to publish Every Soul Is Free. Duke and Kimberly Pennell fulfilled their promise to get it published in time for my 50th Reunion last May. I created an ambitious marketing plan that touched all the bases.

Caveat before we go any further: It is more likely that I will be learning from you than vice versa. Along the way, I will try hard to pass along information that I have found helpful (like James Altucher’s podcast with Hugh Howey). My suspicion is that the most helpful information I will turn up will help authors who self-publish, publish with print-on-demand publishers or independent publishers. Since I despair at the prospect, I doubt anything I turn up will help my readers crack the agented and New York publishing house market.

As Charlie Steel so adroitly observed of us as a group, I am one of  “us [who] are old.” You might have guessed that with the 50th Reunion reference. For the most part of my life, I did business things. Now that I am in the business of writing I am not at all opposed to author effort. In fact, I welcome it. What I find impossible is coming up with the marketing ideas, channel pursuits, and implementation as well as writing and doing the author effort. I realize that I have been given handbooks and suggestions that, somehow, did not take.

Implement the Marketing Plan: Seven post-publication months have, so far, rolled out from days measured by four hours of joyous writing, two hours of consulting work that pays the mortgage, and four hours of terror and torture that defines my afternoon and my efforts to market my book and build my brand. Six days a week! (Not on Tuesdays because of work to pay the mortgage and not on the weekend because Anne thinks the weekend should look different from the weekday, so only the morning hours of joyous writing go on Saturday and Sunday.)

After three months, I realized I could not do it myself. So, I tried my hand at hiring somebody who would do all the tasks and set up the opportunities for me to come in and make the sale, read the book, give the talk, or sing and dance, whatever it took. They couldn’t do it either.

Reap the results: Website (www.edwardmasseybooks.com); Social media (Facebook, twitter, linked-in accounts); Book store (Barnes and Noble, New Haven (1)); Marketing materials (Cards, postcards, bookmarks); Book club presentations (Connecticut (1)); Evening of reading and discussion (18 high school classmates in Utah (1)); Outreach (Proposals to County School Board re literature from local high school graduates); Award (League of Utah Writers’ Gold Quill for Best Novel Published in 2014; Talk (Providence Art Club: the “Nexus of History and Fiction”(1)); Interview (Emil Franzi on “Voices of the West”; Podcast (Entrepreneur on Fire.); Theme based marketing (Proposals to 3 organizations to promote their themes based on Every Soul Is Free); e-mails and Press Releases (3 blast-e-mails and signed up for PR Wire and BusWire); initiatives that led nowhere (innumerable characterized by no call back.)

This list is in this format because I could not manage the WF blog software, but it is here, at all, because it is the whole list of my marketing results.

That four hours of joyous writing did result in completing my third novel and I am very happy with it. It is not a Western; it would not qualify under the Peacemaker or the Spur Award rules, but it is set in the west and it deals with what I think the west is all about — a man’s values and how he balances career with commitment to family and community. A publisher has shown an interest. The way he expressed his interest was to tell me to submit the full manuscript along with my marketing plan. So, this blog has some real-life meaning.

What Charlie Steel further pointed out is how prolific some WF authors are with 60 to 600 books and a few 35s and even some 10s and 20s thrown in. I think the clear conclusion from Hugh Howey to Charlie Steel is that if you have to choose between marketing and writing. Write! So, although the goal of this year’s blog will be to lay out the program and focus on how to make it happen, the fallback position will always be — end the torture and write!

One learning I have already achieved (by reading all the WF blogs) is that the reason for doing a blog is to get to the end where you make a pitch for your books and your brand. Every single one of them did it. I am cheered.

One of the tasks this blog will force is work on my bio. Here is the starting point: Edward has published a novel, Telluride Promise, five short stories, and Every Soul Is Free. Telluride Promise gained the quarterfinals in the 2010 Amazon Breakthrough Novel Awards. The League of Utah Writers named Every Soul Is Free the Grand Prize winner for best novel published in 2014, awarding Edward the Gold Quill. His third novel is finished and he is at work on his fourth.

All social media accounts set up but not really working. Implementing them will be part of this blog.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

When Western History Turns Out, In Fact, Finally To Be WESTERN FICTION by Steve Kohlhagen


Those of us who write (or, at times, TRY) to write engaging western fiction and, in particular, western historical fiction, are at times amused or appalled when facts turn out to be fiction. This should be viewed as quite a different phenomenon than those who claim "life is more amazing than fiction."

Such is the case for the famous, and now rightly infamous, 1864 Sand Creek Massacre. One hundred fifty years ago last November, the commander of the Colorado Volunteers, John Chivington took his troops out after the Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians camped on Sand Creek. Already a Civil War hero for his efforts at Glorietta, the Methodist Minister-turned-soldier marched his troops from Denver City and routed, destroyed, massacred the sleeping Indians whose warriors were out hunting.

In the century and a half since, many Coloradans and descendants of the early settlers held this battle up, oddly, as a great Civil War victory. And plaques to that effect still can be found in Denver and elsewhere in the state.

The problem is, as many soldiers of the times knew (some refused the order to attack), this was not only not a great Civil War battle, but, as has been chronicled in some history books, movies, and historical fiction (including my forthcoming Chief of Thieves from Sunstone Press), it was a massacre of innocent women and children peacefully camped under both an American and a white flag. Furthermore, many of the soldiers committed horrible atrocities and paraded the results of those atrocities through the streets of Denver City.

Last November 29th, on the 150th Anniversary of the massacre, Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado publicly apologized on behalf of the State of Colorado.

Here is a thorough Denver Westword article on the issues leading up to the public ceremony and the ceremony itself, both from the white and Indian point of view:

http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2014/12/sand_creek_massacre_apology_colorado_john_hickenlooper.php?utm_source=Newsletters&utm_medium=email

The overriding takeaways from this incident are, of course, horrible: from Chivington's (and some say Governor John Evans') duplicity and bestiality; to the betrayal of Black Kettle's serial attempts at peace with the whites; to the atrocities committed on innocent women, children, and babies by individual soldiers; to the murder of Captain Silas Soule in a Denver City alley after he testified against Chivington; to the enmity and rationalizations that led to the false Coloradan century-long memories and celebrations of an exemplary Civil War victory.

Kudos to Governor Hickenlooper and those responsible for the apology and for setting the facts straight and for putting the fiction irrevocably to bed. And kudos, too, to the patience and grace of the contemporary Cheyenne and Arapaho peoples.





  

Friday, January 2, 2015

Did the US Army Ever Use Lever-action Rifles? by Gordon Rottman



Cheryl mentioned that there was a blog spot open and so as to not let it go to waste, I popped in n article from my e-book, The Big Book of Gun Trivia: Everything you want to know, don't want to know, and don't know you need to know.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Book-Gun-Trivia-ebook/dp/B00GQA26C8



One often sees Western movies depicting “Yellow Legs” armed with some model of Winchester lever-action rifle, either Model of 1873 rifles or Model of 1892 carbines, which appeared after most of the Indian fighting had taken place. From 1873 to the turn of the century the Army used .45-70 single-shot, trapdoor Springfields and prior to that from 1866 the .50-70 in trapdoor Springfields. The Old West frontier army was not armed with lever-action rifles.
There actually was a lever-action rifle seeing extremely limited use by the Army though, but well after Indian fighting was past. This was the Winchester Model of 1895 rifle in .30-40 Krag. While popular hunting rifle, the Army version was fitted with a near full-length military-style stock, bayonet lug, and a box magazine rather than the usual tubular magazine found on most bolt-actions. Earlier Winchester lever-action rifles could not handle high-powered smokeless powder loads. John Browning developed the Model 1895’s stronger action for calibers up to .405 Winchester (quite able to bring down any North American big game, for which it was designed). The Army ordered 10,000 chambered for the standard .30-40 Krag cartridge in 1898 as bolt-action Krag production could not meet Spanish-American War demands. Only 100 were issued to the 33d Volunteer Infantry Regiment in the Philippines in 1899 for field-testing. With sufficient Krags available for the post-war Army the Winchesters were returned to the States in 1900 and sold off to the civilian market. The main complaint of the military Model of 1895 was that the magazine had to be loaded one round at a time with the cartridge inserted vertically in the chamber centered on the magazine follower, rotated rearward, and slid into the magazine. This was far too slow. The remaining 9,900 were sold to the new Cuban Army in 1906. Civilian Model 1895 rifles and carbines were quite popular with the Texas and Arizona Rangers, Border Patrol, Pinkerton National Detective Agency, and many law officers from the turn of the century. It was a favorite rifle of Teddy Roosevelt and many other big game hunters. The Model ‘95 was available in .30-40 Krag, .30-03, .30-06, .303 British, .35 Winchester, .38-72 Winchester, .40-72 Winchester, and .405 Winchester.
Russia purchased 300,000 Winchester military Model 1895 rifles in 7.62x54mmR in 1915 and by 1917 almost 200,000 had been delivered before a ban was placed on arms deliveries after the Russian Revolution broke out. The Russian model had charging clip guides allowing the magazine to be loaded using the standard Mosin-Nagant five-round charging clip, a feature the earlier US Army-acquired Model 1895s lacked. Some of these ended up being used by Finland during the 1918-19 Finnish Civil War and the 1939-40 Winter War, and the USSR provided many to Republican forces during the 1936-39 Spanish Civil War.
One other lever-action rifle did see limited US Army service. Owing to the severe shortage of rifles in 1917 the Ordnance Department ordered 1,800 Winchester Model 1894 carbines chambered for .30 Winchester Center Fire (aka .30-30 Winchester). These were purchased for use by the Signal Corps to arm guards in the Pacific Northwest (Washington and Oregon). They were to ensure there were no labor disruptions to spruce lumbering, a material essential to aircraft construction. The Aviation Section of the Signal Corps was then responsible for all aviation-related procurement. The Winchesters were delivered in early 1918. They were sold as surplus soon after the war and are considered collector’s pieces being known as “spruce guns,” although there’s no spruce in their woodwork. It is not uncommon for civilian rifles to be stamped with Army markings and sold at fakes, but the serial numbers can be checked to verify if a weapon was actually Government Issue.
The US Army did earlier make some use of a lever-action rifle. The Federal Government purchased only 1,500 .44-caliber Henry Model 1860 rifles early in the Civil War. The Chief of Ordnance was unimpressed by what was the most advanced rifle seeing wartime service. It was heavy when fully loaded with 15 rounds in its tubular magazine, the .44 Flat Henry cartridge could not be used in any other weapon, the rifle and ammunition were expensive, and he saw no advantage over single-shot, breech-loading weapons such as the widely used Sharps carbine. Regardless, some 10,000 Henry “Yellow Boy” rifles were produced during the war and thousands were purchased by state-equipped units and individual soldiers for $40 (privates were paid $13 a month). Soldier impressed with its high magazine capacity said of it, “The rifle that can be loaded on Sunday and fired all week.” A few cavalry units used Henry’s and nine infantry regiments from Illinois and Indiana were armed with them being purchased by those states. See ‘What was the gun that won the West?’
Lever-action rifles are said to offer a slightly faster rate of fire when compared to military bolt-actions. The main drawback is that lever-action rifles are more difficult to operate when firing from the prone position, a common firing position of the era, and when firing over trench parapets. It noticeably reduced the rate of fire from such a position. The under-barrel tubular magazine used on most lever-action rifles was not conducive to pointed military bullets and had to be loaded one-round-at-a-time; no rapid-loading charger clips. Lever-action rifles are more susceptible to dirt and fouling and most could not deal with the increased chamber pressures generated by modern smokeless powder military cartridges. They were not as accurate at long ranges as bolt-action rifles and the available cartridges, being lower powered than most of the era’s military cartridges, did not have the necessary long range then desired. Because most lever-actions ejected spent cartridges from the top of the receiver they could not mount telescopes, which was also a drawback for hunting rifles, although this was not much of a military consideration at the time. The Model of 1895 had the reputation of generating a hard kick owing to its high-powered cartridges and the design of its shoulder stock.
Lever-action rifles did play a pivotal role in warfare, however, namely the 1877-78 Russo-Turkish War. In 1877 the Ottoman Empire purchased 30,000 Winchester .44-40 Model 1873 lever-action rifles—“the gun that won the West.” Intended to be issued to the cavalry, that branch had been largely disbanded and they were issued to the infantry defending Plevna (known today as Pleven in north-central Bulgaria) against the Russians. Each soldier was also armed with an American Peabody-Martini 11.43mm Model 1874 single-shot, breech-loading rifle, the standard Turkish infantry arm. When the Russians attacked on 30 July the Turks opened fire with their Peabody-Martinis at up to 2,000 yards range cutting down the massed Russian formations as they ponderously marched toward the Turkish entrenchments. As the staggering, densely packed Russians pressed forward, on command the Turks set aside the single-shot rifles and picked up their Winchester repeaters, for which each man had been supplied 600 rounds. At 200 yards the Metmetçiks opened up a deadly rapid and accurate fire; they had been drilled well. The Russians were mowed down in droves and the attack was utterly defeated. After reinforcement in September, the Russians made another attempt using the same headlong tactics and met the same fate. The Russians lost over 20,000 troops in the two attacks. While the bolt-action rifle would become the standard for military repeating rifles, the day of the single-shot rifle was over, but its demise was heralded by a lever-action rifle.
As a side note, repeating rifles were initially rejected by armies content with conventional single-shot rifles. During the American Civil War, one of the first successful repeating rifles, the seven-shot, tubular magazine-fed, breech-loading .52-56 Spencer Model of 1860 rifle, was first turned down at the beginning of the war with the reasoning that soldiers would fire too fast and waste ammunition. There were legitimate concerns of the logistic system’s ability to keep mass armies supplied with ammunition if armed with such weapons. The development of metallic cartridges was still in its infancy were slow and expensive to produce. Some 95,000 Spencer rifles and carbines were eventually issued to Union forces in late 1863 and proved very successful with a sustained rate of 20 rounds per minute (a muzzle-loader’s rate was two or three rounds per minute). Owing to the inaccuracy of the era’s muzzle-loaders and poor aiming techniques, the Union Army estimated that 900 pounds (408 kilograms) of lead and 240 pounds (109 kilograms) of powder were required to kill one Confederate soldier—12,600 shots. Not calculated in the equation was the number of wounded, but there was generally three or four wounded per fatality, many of whom would never return to the battlefield. (A Union Springfield .58-caliber Model of 1861 rifle fired a 500-grain minie ball propelled by an 85-grain black powder charge.) The Federal Government purchased 1,022,176,474 small arms cartridges and 1,220,555,435 percussion caps during the war. That does not count cartridges and caps purchased by state militias.