Here's a simple question for you.
What is bad writing?
Objectively, as far as such things can be
measured, or subjectively to your individual preference --what makes a piece of
fiction bad?
I've spent the last few months catching up to a
new year's resolution I made to read all the indie books open on my Kindle. Not
all the books archived, just the ones I'd put on the machine and hadn't yet
looked at. As expected, I enjoyed most of them. Others, not so much.
Innocently enough, I checked out some online reviews of the titles I'd read.
And herein lies the question.
Books I considered poorly written, but with an
adequate story or cast of characters, got just as many stars as books of
outstanding prose. Stories that didn't make any sense at all, with murky
settings, and cliched or non distinct characters, often got as many good
reviews as their opposites.
In other words, there seems to be a lack of
consistency in what people judge as good or bad.
Not exactly news, I know, but it got me to
thinking about what's most important to a story. As a writer I wondered,
what do people want?
Most say a good character. But I wonder, do you
have to like him/her? Is it enough to identify with some aspect of them? Do you
even need that?
Some say plot is secondary, not as important as
character. But can beating the same old tired story trail be considered good
writing?
When you read, is grammar important to you? If
the author drops that Oxford comma, do you throw the book across the room in
disgust?
How about this: do you have different parameters
for different genres?
For example, I'm willing to skip over (or look
up) unfamiliar words I come across in a western. Even if the author is
making them up. On the other hand, I weary of the made-up words in
science fiction. Too much techno-babble and I'm outta there.
What about originality? Nothing will kick me out
of a book faster than an author who repeats the same scene from book to book.
In my New Year's batch was a western writer I had previously never heard of
(and who isn't, I don't think, a member of the Fictioneers). I tried two of the
guy's titles and couldn't make it through any of them. Especially when,
half-way through the first chapter of the second book, I read the exact same shoot-em-up scene I'd read in the first story.
My vague conclusion --for me-- is that bad
writing is anything that --when repeated more than once or twice-- knocks me
(as a reader) out of the story.
(That goes for too many dashes, parentheses, and
italic words too!)
I'll put up with bad grammar for a while if the
story is good. I'll put up with a trite story if the characters are good. I'll
put up with bad characters if I like the word choice on a sentence level. Or if
I like the setting. If the dialog crackles, I'll stick with a murky setting.
But when the mistakes add up, that's when I put
the book down.
How about you?
After
growing up on a Nebraska farm, Richard Prosch worked as a professional
writer, artist, and teacher in Wyoming, South Carolina, and Missouri.
His western crime fiction captures the fleeting history and lonely
frontier stories of his youth where characters aren’t always what they
seem, and the windburned landscapes are filled with swift, deadly
danger. Read more at www.RichardProsch.com
