DIG IT OUT, DOC!
Part 1 ARROWS
Keith Souter aka Clay More
Out on the
frontier a doctor would have to be prepared to deliver babies, splint and fix
broken bones, and dig out arrows and bullets. Tough work, if you
then had to go and play poker and drink a little whiskey.
In many a western a doctor is either
called upon to dig out a bullet or arrow. He usually does so with some ease,
depositing the missile in a tin bowl with a resounding clunk, a wipe of his
brow and the message that “he’ll be all right now, once I patch up the wound.”
But of course, in real life things
are not quite as simple, so in this post I’m going to look at digging out
arrows. In a later post we’ll talk about digging out bullets.
An ancient weapon
I often mention that I live within arrowshot
of the ruins of a medieval castle. The
castle is a Norman motte-and-bailey, one of many built all over England after
the Norman Conquest by William the Conqueror in 1066. It is called Sandal Castle
and although it is very much a ruin now, it was once of of the two most
important castles in the north of England. Along with Sheriff Hutton near York,
it was the base for the Council of the North, effectively the government for
the North of England as established by King Richard III. You may know him from William Shakespeare’s
portrayal of him as the villainous uncle who had his two nephews murdered in
the Tower of London. King Richard had started a rebuilding schedule a couple of years before his death.
The farmland around the castle was
the site of the Battle of Wakefield in 1460, when King Richard’s father, The
Duke of York was killed and beheaded. It was a brutal battle fought with
longbow, pikes, swords and battle-axes.
I am a member of the Friends of
Sandal Castle, a group who try to maintain the castle’s image and its place in
history. Among other things, I have an interest in the longbow, since it played
such a part in English history. And of course, the bow and arrow is one of the
most ancient weapons. Indeed, the
invention of a weapon that fires projectiles a good distance enabled man to
make hunting safer and more effective in the days of our earliest ancestors.
Inevitably, as a swift weapon against other men it had no equal for many
millennia. In a paper written in 2001
in World Journal of Surgery, Karger estimates that in the history of warfare,
arrows have killed more people than any other weapon, including firearms.
The ruins of the Great Hall at Sandal Castle. The moat is beyond the far wall and archers would have defended the battlemented walls.
Surgery advances in
times of war
It is an old maxim
that surgeons adapt their techniques to the injuries of their times. The more trauma that is
seen, the worse the injuries, then surgeons develop operations and methods to deal with them.
There is a misconception that
surgeons were an ill-trained lot of butchers in days gone by. In fact, in
medieval times surgeons were often highly skilled and ingenious people. Having
good surgeons in your army or navy was reckoned to be utterly essential, for
people suffered horrific injures and needed to be treated. Arrow wounds were a
major cause of death and morbidity.
At the Battle of Shrewsbury in 1403
Prince Henry , who would later become King Henry V (all this is recounted in
Shakespeare’s Henry IV Parts I and 2) was wounded in the face by an arrow. It apparently entered at the side of his
nose, and according to the prince’s own surgeon, John Bradmore, it went in to a
depth of almost six inches. Impossible, you might say. And
again, how could he survive? Well, it is possible. This could well have been a
penetrating injury that went in below the brain. He was undoubtedly lucky to
survive, yet the skill of his surgeon is incredible.
John Badmore treated the wound with
honey, crafted a surgical instrument to screw into the wooden shaft so that he
could extract it. Then he washed t out
with alcohol. The patient was left with his battle scar, but also with great
credibility as a warrior. He went on to become the hero of the Battle of
Agincourt. A large part of his success at the battle was his deployment of English longbowmen.
A contemporary drawing of Bradmore's arrow extractor, from the book Fair Book of Surgery, c 1450
Ambroise Paré
(1510-1590)
At the Battle
of Milan in 1536 a young barber-surgeon
came across two badly wounded soldiers. A comrade asked f there was anything
that he could do for them. Upon answering that he could not, the soldier slit
their throats to put them out of their misery. Ambrose Pare was the surgeon. He was horrified and
he vowed that in the future he would do all that he could to help even the most
badly injured person. He famously said:
The
art of medicine is to cure sometimes, relieve often and
comfort always.
Ambroise Paré operating
Ambroise Paré was true to his
words. He became one of most influential
anatomists and is regarded as one of the fathers of modern surgery. He devised
means of treating wounds, invented prosthetic limbs and he introduced the technique
of ligating arteries, rather than cauterizing them. Significantly, he established battlefield surgical techniques that greatly improved the chances of a casualty's survival.
Various prostheses invented by Ambroise Paré.
Arrow wounds were, of course, common and Paré developed a pair of forceps for removing detached arrowheads. The uppermost of the two drawings below shows the forceps and the lowermost shows them being inserted into the arrowhead to remove it.
Of course, there were many different types of arrowheads,several of which barbed. Removing them would cause further damage, if they were simply drawn out. That demanded greater ingenuity on the part of the surgeons, who developed dilators and other instruments in order to protect the tissues as well as they could and allowed them to retrieve the arrowheads.
Dig it out, Doc!
One of the best sources of information about arrow wounds in the modern era comes from a paper by Dr J H Bill, an MD and Assistant Surgeon, published in the American Journal of the Medical Sciences, published in 1862. He wrote this paper from his own experience as a surgeon on the frontier.
He begins by describing how arrows are made, which is really crucial to the understanding of the problems involved with arrow wounds. Basically, the arrow has a shaft and a head. The shaft would vary in size from two to three feet, generally being made from dogwood. The head would be inserted into a slit and lashed to the shaft. The head would be made of iron, varying in size from half an inch to two and a half inches n length, and about half an inch to three-quarters of an inch in width at the base.
The lashing was done with tendons, which were tied tightly and allowed to dry to tighten them further. This is also of importance to our understanding, because once an arrow penetrates the body the tissue fluids and blood would cause the lashing tendon to swell and come loose. Any attempt to pull the arrow out, as people were wont to do, would simply cause the shaft to come out, leaving the potentially lethal arrow-head inside the body.
Dr Bill describes the relative frequency of arrow wounds. Wounds to the upper limbs were the commonest, because you could see an arrow coming and attempt to fend it off, only to sustain a wound, probably hitting and lodging in bone. Then came abdominal wounds, then chest, then lower limbs, then head, and lastly neck. Multiple arrow wounds were common, since a bowman could fire off six arrows per minute and once a person was hit once, they would be easy targets for the second and third.
The following are his recommendations for wounds to non-vital parts of the body.
1. An arrow passing through a limb makes a clean half-punctured, half-incised wound, which will generally heal by first intention, if proper treatment be instituted (That means the wound heals well as the two sides of the wound contact one another. This is as opposed to healing by second intention, as when a cavity heals from the bottom outwards. the second takes longer.)
2. An arrow lodging in bone requires some force, much tact, strong forceps, and an ample incision for its removal. (That means the wound needs to be made larger)
3. This removal should always be effected as soon as possible after the receipt of the injury, and the greatest care taken in doing so not to detach the shaft from the head of the arrow.
4. Always use the finger to explore the lodgement of an arrow-head and to determine if it is bent or straight.
5. If we fail to detect or to extract an arrow-head lodged in bone, we wait a few days, trusting to suppuration, tents, position, etc, and then search again and again for it.
6. If we fail in removing the foreign body by these means, we operate, making large incisions and compressing the artery of the limb.
He also advocated using a magnet to attempt to detect the arrow-head.
To remove arrows lodged in the chest or the abdomen he stated that it was vital to get the arrow-head out, otherwise it would be fatal. To do so he advised using a Coghill's suture twister, a long probe, basically, which could be used to pass along the length of the arrow shaft, bearing with it a loop of wire suture. This would be done after making a large incision to permit space and subsequently ease the extraction. The loop would be passed over the tip of the arrow-head and then drawn tight. It would then be twisted around the shaft, thereby ensuring that traction on the shaft would not cause the head to separate. And out it would come!
Then, clunk! Into the bowl.
