Chapter 2
I’m going to keep on with the book, Class and Race in the
Frontier Army. This session, let’s have a look at Chapter 2: The Mental Worlds
of Officers.
The officers impressed me as very self-important,
exceedingly courteous and cordial and charming in their broad-gauge views of
current events and their unreserved candor in discussing all subjects.
—Robert McKay, civilian contract surgeon, U.S. Army
John Wayne, officer |
Kevin Adams, author of the book, says, “Officers in the
frontier army were part of a national movement with wide-ranging implications:
the implicit recasting of the United States as a permanently class-based
society. . . . Far from being ‘isolated’ from American society and culture,
frontier officers were firmly in the mainstream.”
We must remember that most of the army officers of the day
were graduates of West Point or perhaps one of the military academies such as
VMI. College graduation in and of itself tended to propel the graduate into a
higher class. And, says Adams, that meant that an officer had to be well read,
even when serving on remote areas of the frontier.
Even while stationed at a one-company camp in a remote
stretch of northern California in the late 1860s, Lieutenant Thaddues Capron
and his wife, Jennie, were able to maintain their subscriptions to “Godley’s . . . the Atlantic . . . Harpers
& Leslie’s Weekly’s, N.Y. Herald, London Illustrated News, besides many
others.” According to Thaddeus, “By the papers we keep quite well posted in
what is going on in the outside world.”
Later, Capron wrote his wife, “You can hardly imagine with
what eagerness a newspaper is sought and perused—groups of officers sitting or
standing around while one of the number reads aloud the news of the day.”
In some cases, writes Adams, it seemed that officers viewed
their time in the field as more of a gentleman’s hunting trip than a
professional military expedition.
Leisure time, he writes, an emblem of officers’ status as
gentlemen, enabled them to fully engage with Gilded Age intellectual culture.
Capron’s diary from the late 1860s reads: “Inspection
assumed this a.m. The most of the day spent in reading.”
Officers from the movie, Fort Apache |
Army officers were also writers. Adams says that one-fourth
of the men who graduated from West Point in the 1870s went on to publish books
and articles on military topics. Others gave speeches or contributed to
newspapers. And, “perhaps the most prolific author was Captain Charles King of the 5th Cavalry, who
was one of the most popular novelists of the late nineteenth century. Between
the early 1880s and WWI, he wrote some 250 short stories, 38 books about the
army in the West (with plots and atmosphere taken directly from his campaign
diaries), and 34 books on other subjects; 27 of his novels were printed in
multiple editions. . . . According to one historian, King’s work remains
significant as ‘the first series of western novels that were regarded as
serious literature in their day.’”
In addition to reading, music and theater were favorites
among the officier corps. At Fort Hays, Kansas, for example, the 7th
Cavalry Band played three hours of “sweet music” every day during the spring of
1868. Furthermore, officers of the 13th Infantry regiment might have
attended eleven band concerts between June and November of 1886; concerts
formal enough to merit printed programs.
Post-Civil War officers loved the theater, both to attend
and to participate in. Says Adams: Captain Samuel J. Ovenshine’s personal
papers provide an especially focused snapshot of army theater.
His papers included handbills from 44 plays performed at
frontier posts and his letters highlight his commitment to theater. He helped
form the “Fort Keogh Dramatic Club” and recruited club officers from the
officer corps. The performed such plays as Macbeth, Robinson Crusoe, the Count
of Monte Cristo, As You Like It, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and Rip Van Winkle. Adams
goes on to say, “Ovenshine’s was not an isolated experience. Active engagement
in theater was common among officers."
I wonder how many army officers today are involved in
theater.
Officers as scientists.
So-called scientists in the late nineteenth century tended
to be generalists. In fact, not many “scientific” subjects were taught at
universities of the day. Officers, however, often made scientific observations
in their diaries and some in articles.
Concerning the Indians, Major Robert Dunlap Clarke wrote, “the
principal tribes have a language of signs by which they communicate with one
another with wonderful accuracy.”
Clarke’s diary had discourses on geology and speaks of
disputes he had with fellow officers on the subject, he wrote of gypsum bluffs
one day and cap rock on the top of bluffs another. He even has an entry
doubting the intelligence of Colonel Merrill, who “thinks he has found a piece
of gold-bearing quartz. Though it is probably nothing but a limestone or
dark-hued marble.”
Troop C of the 3rd Cavalry |
The strange thing is, all the while Clarke is writing
discourses on geology and Indians, he was in the midst of an all-out Indian
offensive against the three Bozeman Trail forts.
With civilians, the officers of the late nineteenth century
had a belief that moral values colored all facets of life, and held a reverence
for high culture, particularly the elements of America’s Anglo-Saxon Protestant
heritage. Adams writes that “American elites after the Civil War recognized one
another as members of the same tribe.”
For the American masses, he wrote, whether native-born or
immigrant, genteel culture offered nothing at all. For the middle and upper
classes, however, it offered one clear set of standards to govern public
behavior.
The cultural standards and values of post-Civil War elites
were not in their minds abstract truths, but instead, as one scholar notes,
reflected a social hierarchy of stations and classes. . . . Gilded Age intellectual
culture was not a world open to all, and the degree of allegiance to its
exacting standards allowed members of the middle and upper classes to discern
fellow tribesmen, while largely excluding nonwhites and those considered poor
or ignorant.
This system of exclusions, which was built into the
worldview of officers and others of the genteel, was deployed most powerfully
against the American Indians. The officers’ interest in science, and their
standpoint that Indians were “vanishing,” may have been the reasons for their
seeking out Indian remains to send back to the East for “Scientific study.”
One example:
Officers of the 7th Cavalry at Wounded Knee |
Lieutenants Robert G. Carter and Wentz Miller, along with
the unit’s contract surgeon and Carter’s cook Bob, seized Comanche dead after a
frontier skirmish, cut off their heads, and, “placing them in some gunny sacks,
brought them back to be boiled out for future scientific knowledge.”
Adams concludes the chapter with: Conservative, sophisticated,
and certain of their (deserved) place in the world, officers and their families
thrived in a milieu of prosperous gentry.
Next month: Soldiers, Servants, or Slaves
A fascinating series of posts. While reading it, I wondered how other officers reacted to West Pointers like Flipper, before his downfall. Looking forward to the next in this series.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, thank you also for the gift of your book. Doris
Chuck,
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely an outstanding article about the culture of officers of the time period and their behaviors toward Indians while serving out assigned duties in the west.
Charlie
As I said last month, I am a big fan of this book- and of Charlie's review/explanation of it and the topics it addresses.
ReplyDeleteDoris, I almost put a picture of Flipper in, but there was no comment on Black officers, so I refrained. We'll see what the rest of the book brings us.
ReplyDelete