Henry Graham looked up from the conversation with his daughter when three men walked through the door. This trio was trouble—especially hotheaded Milt Ferris—and he felt almost offended by the intrusion. One of the men pulled down the window shade to block the view into the office from the street.
"Hey!" Graham called out, and turned to his daughter and whispered. "Stay back here. If something happens, get out through the back and get Tim." He thought about retrieving a small handgun he kept in the desk drawer, but decided against it.
"I'd prefer keeping the shade up," said Graham, wiping his hands on an ink-stained cloth he kept in his back pocket as he approached the trio.
"No need to get all riled about a little privacy," Ferris said, grinning.
"We run a newspaper, not a confessional. What do you want?"
"Look, we're not lookin' for trouble," Ferris said. "We're here sort of unofficial-like, askin' you to tone down some things you been writin'."
"Lucas send you here?" Graham said, common knowledge this trio worked for him.
"Everybody thinks you're puttin' the town in a bad light." The man's eyelids fluttered rapidly as he spoke.
"No one ever mentioned to me how they feel. I can't imagine Lucas Cameron, or any other business owner, hiring you on as their mouthpiece. None of you strike me as the chamber of commerce types."
--Excerpt from the novel, Last Stand At Bitter Creek.
Frontier newspapers served as strong voices for the communities in which they operated.
Their arrival in Bitter Creek coincided with the Union Pacific's recent completion of a railroad depot. The presence of a railroad also helped lure settlers crossing the vast territory west of the Missouri to communities that sprang up along the rail line.
Our fictional Henry Graham, like other frontier newspaper editors, often assumed the role of moral compass for the public. If those who broke, or skirted the law, went unpunished, Graham and his counterparts had no problem admonishing them, even to the point of publishing names and crimes. Public officials, who declined to react to such lawlessness, weren't spared negative publicity either. They often saw their names in print too, including town council members, mayor, sheriff, or judge.
In addition to satisfying an appetite for news - local, national, and world - newspapers also functioned as a resource for advertising and basic information, such as stage and train schedules, announcements of various meetings, church services, names of new residents, and more.
Aside from the morality role, newspapers played a key role in populating the West. In many cases, they functioned as the marketing arm of the community, helping to lure new residents and business enterprises. Editors tried to position their particular community as one of stability and growth, with a demonstrated respect for law and order.
Many editors, however, tried to proceed with caution and sensitivity when it came to allocating space about injustice. Too much focus on criminal activities could possibly discourage potential relocation.
As a result, despite all their preaching about law and order, some didn't hesitate in suggesting vigilanteism in cases where the law was weak to follow through in solving crime.
Operating a newspaper, aside from its moral obligation, was a tough and challenging business. Editors with antiquated presses often fell short of type and printing supplies because of erratic delivery schedules.
Some editors faced competition from rival newspapers operating in the same community. In many cases, the competition deteriorated into a war of words. Neither side was shy about the kind of words they used to characterize each other.
Dee Brown, in discussing the competitive invective between rival editors in his book, Wondrous Times on the Frontier, wrote that the record for the "largest number of derogatory adjectives in a one-paragraph editorial" probably belonged to the editor of the Watonga (Oklahoma) Republican, who attacked the editor of the rival Rustler, on Nov. 29, 1893:
"The ignorant, egotistical, scrawny, miserable, contemptible, disgusting, measly, mangy, depraved, lying, hypocritical, blear-eyed, dough-faced, idiotic, dwarfed, pinched-up, quaking old numbskull of the ex-Rustler ghost still continue to impose himself upon a people who are even more completed disgusted with him than were the Nebraska people who compelled him to make a premature and hasty exit."
Obviously, this editor had no problem expressing himself.
For the most part, editors gave frontier readers what they wanted: entertainment. As a result, truth and accuracy were sometimes at a premium.
Despite the inherent hardships, it's estimated that thousands of newspapers populated the frontier. Some succeeded, and even carry on today. Others didn't last long, closing either because of a lack of financial resources, or lack of courage.
Among the more successful were these newspapers:
- Tombstone Epitaph
- Denver's Rocky Mountain News, and Cherry Creek Pioneer
- Territorial Enterprise
- The Cherokee Phoenix, first newspaper published by Native Americans, and first published in Native American language.
- The Californian, the first California newspaper
- Harper's Weekly
I love reading old newspapers. The language style and the content are certainly different than what we get today. A lot of times, a reporter will poke fun at a leading citizen, or make light of a dreadful incident. They sure could be inventive with their copy during a slow news time.ReplyDelete
Wow, that was quite a string of adjectives! Thanks, Tom. I sure enjoyed this article.
Hi Jacquie--Inventive is right. Especially when it came to battling competition, as Dee Brown documents. Defaming public officials in the 19th century America seemed a long-standing tradition.ReplyDelete
I find it interesting how much influence the media had in the old west. Last Stand At Bitter Creek sounds like my kind of book. Now all I need is time to read for fun again.ReplyDelete
Thanks, Livia. Maybe some newspaper editors were influential because they were daring and strongly opinionated. I hope you find the time to read for fun again--a challenge, I think, for most of us these days. I shudder to think the time you spent so graciously guiding me through the "mechanics" of this blog could have used to read my book. LOL!ReplyDelete
Tom, I just wrote you a LONG comment and blogger ate it. In a nutshell, I loved your post--always learn something from your posts--and I'm like Livia about having no "pleasure reading" time, but I do have my copy of Last Stand at Bitter Creek and am looking forward to reading it!ReplyDelete
Should have also said, we still have several tribal newspapers here in Oklahoma.ReplyDelete
Blogger must be hungry today too. Glad you enjoyed the post. The only tribal newspaper I'm familiar with is the Cherokee Phoenix which, I think, also operates a radio station, although I could be wrong. Thanks for joining in.ReplyDelete
That was a great post, Tom. And wow, that is a real string of invective.ReplyDelete
I love to hear of newspapers having a long history. It shows that they are valued by communities. The newspaper that I have written for, for three decades, was established in 1852. When I started writing my column I wrote it in longhand and duly delivered it by hand. Then I got a portable typewriter, then a word processor, then a computer. I loved the fax machine, but now, with email it is just so easy. And how the printing has changed, from the old hot plates, to the new digital printing. But sadly, the number of jobs has dwindled. At one time they employed a huge team, now .... It is the same everywhere, I guess.
But the fact is that a local newspaper still has a lot of influence. I have now been through six editors of the paper and some have been more outspoken than others.
And I have to say that I owe a lot to my editors over the years. Being able to have a writing outlet all those years has been a privilege. It has given me the opportunity to get health messages out to the community.
So, I am all in favour of the community papers - keep those presses rolling, I say.
I read Last Stand at Bitter Creek, and loved it- looking forward to the next one!ReplyDelete
Keith--A good editor is worth his or her weight in gold. So valuable. I remember using a portable typewriter with carbon paper to write magazine articles, and then graduated to an IBM Selectric that I thought was the pinnacle of technology. One day, I walked in to a computer story and the young teckie had me sit down at a brown screen with a keyboard that typed yellow letters. He highlighted a block of sentences, hit a key and they disappeared. And then he inserted them elsewhere. Unbelievable. I had seen the future! Of course, the future didn't show up for a couple of years, but nothing has been the same since. BUT--I never had to write longhand! Which is good, because no one would have been able to read it.ReplyDelete
Troy--thanks for the nice comment. I am working on the next one.ReplyDelete
Tom, you haven't seen my typical doctor scrawl! Hey - maybe that is why there were so many typos seemed to creep into my column back then?ReplyDelete
Pity the poor editor assigned to you back then, Keith.ReplyDelete
He probably called a pharmacist to translate.ReplyDelete
This is a subject that always interests me in western movies. I think screenwriters have identified with newspaper editors and made them often fierce advocates of both free speech and freedom of the press. They usually have the most book learning in a western community and tend to be enlightened in their politics. Thus they are often the object of pressure, intimidation, and outright violence, as in John Ford's THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE. Thanks, Tom, for your always thoughtful and articulate post.ReplyDelete
Hi Ron, Good to hear you enjoyed it. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is perfect example. Thanks.ReplyDelete